CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Welcome to the official website of the


CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand
CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo

contact
links
want to join?
register
search the CSANZ website
search the CSANZ website
     







search the CSANZ website













CSANZ Directory

CSANZ Member Directory

CSANZ Guidelines

Practice Guidelines

Training and Competence

Meetings

What's On and Where

ASM Abstracts Online

News and Views

Newsletter - On the Pulse

Newsletter - CNWG

In the News

Affiliate News
Career Opportunities

Affiliate Member Area

Affiliate Calendar

Affiliate Discussion

Scholarships/ Fellowships

Working Groups


ASM Abstracts

UTILITY OF LEFT VENTRICULAR FLOW PROPAGATION VELOCITY DURING DOBUTAMINE STRESS ECHHCARDIOGRAPHY.

C Young*, E Hassan, M Milne, P Bridgman.

Department of Cardiology, Christchurch Hospital Christchurch,New Zealand

Left ventricular flow propagation velocity is a new tool for assessing diastolic function using colour Doppler M-mode. We studied flow propagation velocity during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). 28 consecutive patients (18 males) of age range 22 to 80 years (median 64) undergoing DSE were studied. Patients were classified by whether or not baseline left ventricular function was impaired and by the presence or absence of inducible ischaemia.

Under resting conditions there was a trend towards higher flow propagation velocity in those with normal left ventricular systolic function compared to those with impaired systolic function (46 +/-21 cm/s and 34 +/-13 cm/s, p=0.09). At maximal dobutamine stimulation those patients with normal baseline left ventricular systolic function and no evidence of inducible ischaemia had significantly higher flow propagation velocity than those with normal function but inducible ischaemia (131 +/-52 cm/s versus 60 +/-27 cm/s, p=0.04). In patients with impaired baseline left ventricular systolic function there was no significant difference in flow velocity propagation between those that had inducible ischaemia and those that did not (55 +/- 18 cm/s and 66 +/- 69 cm/s respectively). There was also no significant difference between those that had ischaemia and normal systolic function and those with ischaemia and abnormal systolic function. None of the subjects with inducible ischaemia (irrespective of resting left ventricular function) had peak flow propagation velocity greater than 100 cm/s. In those with no inducible ischaemia there was, however a wide spread of values both above and below this figure.

This study suggests that flow propagation velocity during DSE is influenced by both inducible ischaemia and resting left ventricular systolic function. We did not find flow propagation velocity sufficiently discriminatory to be a useful adjunct in detecting ischaemia.

[ Back to 48th ASM Abstract Index ]


Med-E-Serv