CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Welcome to the official website of the


CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand
CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo

contact
links
want to join?
register
search the CSANZ website
search the CSANZ website
     







search the CSANZ website













CSANZ Directory

CSANZ Member Directory

CSANZ Guidelines

Practice Guidelines

Training and Competence

Meetings

What's On and Where

ASM Abstracts Online

News and Views

Newsletter - On the Pulse

Newsletter - CNWG

In the News

Affiliate News
Career Opportunities

Affiliate Member Area

Affiliate Calendar

Affiliate Discussion

Scholarships/ Fellowships

Working Groups


ASM Abstracts

TISSUE DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY DIFFERENTIATES CONSTRICTIVE PERICARDITIS FROM RESTRICTIVE CARDIOMYOPATHY BUT DOES NOT DISPLAY RESPIRATORY VARIATION  AT  ALL  MITRAL  ANNULAR  MARGINS.

M. Bashir, J.J. Pereira*, I. Abdalla, R. D. Murray, J. Drinko, M.J. Garcia, J.D. Thomas, A. L. Klein.

The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Objective: Measurement of the peak early velocity of longitudinal axis expansion (Ea) using pulsed Tissue Doppler Echocardiography (TDE) at the lateral margin of the mitral annulus is clinically useful in distinguishing constrictive pericarditis (CP) from restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM). However, the use of annular margins other than the lateral to differentiate CP from RCM has not been validated. Furthermore, respiratory variation of Ea at any of the annular locations has not been assessed.

Methods: We studied 11 patients with either CP or RCM. All patients were categorized on the basis of clinical assessment and diagnostic tests including cardiac catheterization, MRI, transthoracic and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography, endomyocardial biopsy and surgical findings. Patients with isolated right-sided CP were excluded. TDE was performed from the apical 2 and 4-chamber views. Ea values were obtained at the lateral, septal, anterior and inferior annular margins. Eavalues were recorded for inspiration, expiration and end-apnea and respiratory variation (%Ea)è was calculated.

Results: There were 5 patients with CP (age= 57± 5 years, 4 male, LVEF= 61± 14%) and 6 patients with RCM (age= 62± 11 years, 4 male, LVEF= 48± 11%).  Results are summarised below.

Margin

Lateral

Septal

Anterior

Inferior

P

Ea CP (cm/s)

12.6 ± 3.1

14.6 ± 4

13.8 ± 5.5

15.8 ± 3.8

NS

Ea RCM(cm/s)

 6.3 ± 3.6

 5.1 ± 2

4.7 ± 1.7

4.4 ± 1.8

NS

P

 0.019

 0.002

 0.0097

 0.0005

%Ea CP (%)

-13 ± 12

-8 ± 15

-9 ± 30

-16 ± 22

NS

%Ea RCM (%)

-6 ± 10

-12 ± 12

-14 ± 13

-8 ± 15

NS

P

NS

NS

NS

NS

è(%Ea )=(Ea expiration - Einspiration / Eexpiration)  X 100%

Conclusions: 1) A higher Ea velocity distinguishes CP from RCM. 2) The septal, anterior and inferior margins are equally useful as the lateral. 3) There is no significant difference in the respiratory variation of Ea velocities between CP and RCM at any of these annular margins.

[ Back to 48th ASM Abstract Index ]


Med-E-Serv