CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Welcome to the official website of the


CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand
CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo

contact
links
want to join?
register
search the CSANZ website
search the CSANZ website
     







search the CSANZ website













CSANZ Directory

CSANZ Member Directory

CSANZ Guidelines

Practice Guidelines

Training and Competence

Meetings

What's On and Where

ASM Abstracts Online

News and Views

Newsletter - On the Pulse

Newsletter - CNWG

In the News

Affiliate News
Career Opportunities

Affiliate Member Area

Affiliate Calendar

Affiliate Discussion

Scholarships/ Fellowships

Working Groups


ASM Abstracts

REVERSE LEFT VENTRICULAR REMODELING IN RESPONSE TO CARVEDILOL: THE HEART IS NEVER TOO BIG TO BENEFIT!

D. Platts*, S. Rudham, DJ. McCaffrey, AM. Keogh and PS. Macdonald.

St. Vincents Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Background:  Carvedilol (C) reduces left ventricular (LV) dimensions and improves systolic function in patients with systolic heart failure (SHF).  The aim of this study was to determine if reverse LV remodeling (rLVR) in response to C was affected by the degree of left ventricular dilation (LVD) at baseline.

Methods:  LVR was assessed by serial echocardiographs in 124 patients with SHF who received C for at least 12 months.  LV dimensions were analyzed as both continuous and categorical variables.  For the latter, patients were divided into two groups above (n=66) and below (n=58) the mean baseline left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD) of 73mm.

Results:  Patients with a "large" baseline LVEDD were more likely to be male and to have a lower baseline fractional shortening (FS), but did not differ from those with a "small" baseline LVEDD with respect to the following characteristics: age, diagnosis, duration of heart failure, NYHA class, serum Na+ and creatinine or concomitant drug therapy.  Changes in LV size and function over 12 months in the two groups (expressed as mean ± sd) are summarised in the table:

Group

 

Large

   

Small

 
 

EDD (mm)

ESD (mm)

FS(%)

EDD (mm)

ESD (mm)

FS (%)

Baseline

82±10

73±10

11±4

65±5

55±5

16±6

12 Mths

80±12**

69±13***

15±6****

63±9*

50±10***

22±9****

*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001 vs baseline

Abbreviations:  EDD = end-diastolic dimension, ESD = end‑-systolic dimension, FS = fractional shortening (all LV measurements)

There were significant decreases over time in EDD and ESD and a highly significant increase in FS in both "large" and "small" groups, but no differences between groups.  Furthermore, simple regression revealed no significant relationship between baseline LVEDD and the change in LVEDD, LVESD over 12 months.

Conclusions:  rLVR in response to C occurs independently of the baseline LVD.

[ Back to 48th ASM Abstract Index ]


Med-E-Serv