CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Welcome to the official website of the


CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand
CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo

contact
links
want to join?
register
search the CSANZ website
search the CSANZ website
     







search the CSANZ website













CSANZ Directory

CSANZ Member Directory

CSANZ Guidelines

Practice Guidelines

Training and Competence

Meetings

What's On and Where

ASM Abstracts Online

News and Views

Newsletter - On the Pulse

Newsletter - CNWG

In the News

Affiliate News
Career Opportunities

Affiliate Member Area

Affiliate Calendar

Affiliate Discussion

Scholarships/ Fellowships

Working Groups


ASM Abstracts

LARGE ARTERY MECHANICAL PROPERTIES CORRELATE WITH SEVERITY OF CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE.

TK Waddell*, TL Medley, CD Gatzka, JD Cameron, AM Dart, BA Kingwell.

Alfred & Baker Medical Unit, Baker Medical Research Institute, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.

Objectives: Proximal aortic compliance has been shown to be lower in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients compared with healthy matched controls. The present study aimed to characterise large artery mechanical properties in relation to severity of CAD, as determined by the magnitude of the maximum coronary stenosis on angiography.

Methods: Seventy-two males with CAD (mean ± SD, 57 ± 9 years) and forty age and gender matched healthy controls (54 ± 10 years) were recruited. CAD patients were classified as having a maximum stenosis of 50-79% (moderate CAD; n = 35) or >=80% (severe CAD; n = 37) of at least one major coronary artery. Arterial mechanics were assessed by measuring systemic arterial compliance (SAC), aortic input impedance and pulse wave velocity (PWV).

Results: SAC was significantly lower in the severe CAD group (mean ± SEM, 0.44 ± 0.04 arbitrary compliance units, ACU) compared to moderate CAD (0.55 ± 0.04 ACU; p = 0.05) and controls (0.62 ± 0.04 ACU; p = 0.001). Furthermore, aortic input impedance was significantly higher in severe CAD (2.59 ± 0.23 mmHg.s.cm-1) compared to moderate CAD (2.06 ± 0.17 mmHg.s.cm-1; p = 0.04) and controls (1.75 ± 0.12 mmHg.s.cm-1; p = 0.001). A similar trend was also evident for carotid-femoral PWV (severe CAD: 11.34 ± 0.71 ms-1 versus moderate CAD: 9.55 ± 0.49 ms-1; p = 0.02; and controls: 9.30 ± 0.29 ms-1; p = 0.005), however there was no difference in femoral-dorsalis pedis PWV between the three groups. Resting carotid pulse pressure was significantly greater in the severe CAD group (54 ± 4 mmHg) compared to moderate CAD (45 ± 3 mmHg; p = 0.05) and controls (39 ± 2 mmHg; p = 0.001), but there was no difference in brachial systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure or heart rate between the three groups.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that there is a correlation between the severity of aortic and coronary atherosclerosis, and that large artery mechanical properties represent a surrogate marker of disease severity in CAD patients.

[ Back to 48th ASM Abstract Index ]


Med-E-Serv