CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Welcome to the official website of the


CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand
CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo

contact
links
want to join?
register
search the CSANZ website
search the CSANZ website
     







search the CSANZ website













CSANZ Directory

CSANZ Member Directory

CSANZ Guidelines

Practice Guidelines

Training and Competence

Meetings

What's On and Where

ASM Abstracts Online

News and Views

Newsletter - On the Pulse

Newsletter - CNWG

In the News

Affiliate News
Career Opportunities

Affiliate Member Area

Affiliate Calendar

Affiliate Discussion

Scholarships/ Fellowships

Working Groups


ASM Abstracts

EVALUATION OF A PRE-ADMISSION CARDIAC SURGICAL CLINIC.

P. Way*, G. Fairbrother, S. Grguric, J. Broe.

Cardiac Services Program, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW.

Aim:  To compare short term patient outcome and cost of preparing patients for cardiac surgery via group based (pre-admission clinic) model vs individual (inpatient) model.

Background:  The provision of patient education prior to cardiovascular surgery has been recognised as efficacious for some decades.  There is increasing interest in the method and timing of patient education.  Principal reasons for this are (i) acceptance of the link between patient preparation and physical and psychological outcome1, (ii) the decreasing time available for preoperative education due to shorter lengths of hospital stay.  The published literature comprises descriptions and evaluation of a range of preparatory interventions.  Most effectiveness studies have assessed individual information/education and/or individual counselling vs control2.  A literature search failed to locate any experimental studies comparing group (i.e. clinic based) vs individual preparation for cardiac surgery.

Moving from an individual to clinic based patient preparation model is likely to prove attractive to Australian health care administrators as the clinic model allows for a shorter preoperative hospital length of stay.  The question remains however ‑- does the clinic model yield similar, worse or better outcomes?

Method & Results:  In this prospective cohort study, patients were allocated to clinic or inpatient preparation on the basis of proximity to the hospital campus.  Differences in patient characteristic indicators (demographics and disease severity) between the two groups were few.  Outcome comparison utilising multiple regression procedures indicated that physical recovery, anxiety and patient satisfaction indicators did not differ between those receiving preparation via the clinic (n=56) and those receiving routine preparation (n=54).  Cost comparison confirmed that the clinic model yields benefits in patient stay terms.  Feedback surveying indicated that those receiving clinic preparation perceived greater relative/carer involvement in their hospital admission.

References:

1.      Katz J (1997) Providing effective patient teaching, American Journal of Nursing 97(5): 33-36

2.      Moore S (1997) Effects of interventions to promote recovery in coronary artery bypass surgical patients, J Cardiovascular Nursing 12(1): 59-70

[ Back to 48th ASM Abstract Index ]


Med-E-Serv