CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Welcome to the official website of the


CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand
CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo

contact
links
want to join?
register
search the CSANZ website
search the CSANZ website
     







search the CSANZ website













CSANZ Directory

CSANZ Member Directory

CSANZ Guidelines

Practice Guidelines

Training and Competence

Meetings

What's On and Where

ASM Abstracts Online

News and Views

Newsletter - On the Pulse

Newsletter - CNWG

In the News

Affiliate News
Career Opportunities

Affiliate Member Area

Affiliate Calendar

Affiliate Discussion

Scholarships/ Fellowships

Working Groups


ASM Abstracts

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF DOBUTAMINE STRESS ECHO IN PATIENTS WITH LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK (LBBB)

J. Federman*, PA. Pellikka, JB. Seward.

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

LBBB is associated with an increased incidence of coronary artery disease )CAD) or cardiomyopathy and management decisions will be affected by the specific diagnosis.  Various nuclear stress procedures have been used to try to distinguish between these 2 diagnoses but there are problems with sensitivity and specificity.  Echocardiography (echo) demonstrates changes in septal motion with a LBBB which can make the interpretation of stress studies difficult.  If wall thickening is also assessed the sensitivity and specificity should improve.  To evaluate the true accuracy of Dobutamine stress echo (DSE) in excluding significant coronary artery disease in a group of patients (Pt) with LBBB we retrospectively assessed a group who had no prior significant CAD.  Of these 4801 Pt with stress DSE between 1/1/94 .1/1/99, 207 Pt had a LBBB.  Of these 20 Pt had coronary angiography (CA) within 30 days post DSE (0 .24 mean 6.1 days), with no prior acute myocardial infarction, coronary bypass graft surgery, coronary angioplasty or CA within 5 yrs.  There were 9 males and 11 females aged 37‑-85 (mean 66.7) yr and all were in sinus rhythm.  Echo left ventricular ejection fraction was <30% in 7 Pt, 30‑-50% in 5 Pt and >50% in 8 Pt.  Indications for DSE were chest pain 8, pre surgery in 7, aortic valve disease in 2 and dyspnoea in 3.  In 15 Pt DSE suggested CAD with 2 Pt being normal and 3 Pt having lesions <50%.  In 10 Pt, lesions >50% were present (>70% in 5 Pt).  In 5 Pt with DSE suggesting no CAD, 1 Pt had no CAD, 3 Pt lesions <50% and 1 Pt lesions >70%.

Accuracy of DSE compared with results of coronary angiography

DSE

LAD
>50%
N=8

LAD
>70%
N=5

LCX
>50%
N=8

LCX
>70%
N=4

RCA
>50%
N=7

RCA
>70%
N=6

Sensitivity

86%

100%

75%

67%

71%

80%

Specificity

54%

50%

92%

71%

38%

40%

PPA

50%

30%

85%

29%

38%

30%

NPA

88%

100%

85%

92%

71%

86%

LAD‑-Left anterior descending, LCX‑-Left circumflex, RCA‑-Right coronary, PPA‑-Positive predictive accuracy, NPA‑-Negative predictive accuracy.

Conclusion:  DSE has limited specificity in the diagnosis of CAD in patients with LBBB with its greatest benefit being in its negative productive accuracy.

[ Back to 48th ASM Abstract Index ]


Med-E-Serv