CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Welcome to the official website of the


CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand
CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo

contact
links
want to join?
register
search the CSANZ website
search the CSANZ website
     







search the CSANZ website













CSANZ Directory

CSANZ Member Directory

CSANZ Guidelines

Practice Guidelines

Training and Competence

Meetings

What's On and Where

ASM Abstracts Online

News and Views

Newsletter - On the Pulse

Newsletter - CNWG

In the News

Affiliate News
Career Opportunities

Affiliate Member Area

Affiliate Calendar

Affiliate Discussion

Scholarships/ Fellowships

Working Groups


ASM Abstracts

BIPHASIC SHOCKS ARE SUPERIOR TO MONOPHASIC FOR HUMAN TRANSTHORACIC DEFIBRILLATION.

SC Faddy*,  J Powell, JC Craig.

Cardiology Department, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney.

Transthoracic defibrillation is the lifesaving treatment for ventricular fibrillation (VF) and haemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia (VT).  Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated the superiority of biphasic waveforms over monophasic for internal defibrillation.  In comparison, only a few, small studies have been performed comparing these waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation.  Monophasic damped sine and truncated exponential waveforms remain the standard for external defibrillators.

Methods:  A systematic review was performed of all studies comparing biphasic and monophasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation.  Studies were included on the basis of methodological quality, suitable study populations, specific interventions and relevant outcome measures.  Data from relevant primary studies were pooled in a meta analysis.

Results:  200J biphasic waveforms defibrillate with greater efficacy than 200J monophasic (RR=1.10, 95%CI: 1.03 - 1.17).  Efficacy equivalent to that of a 200J monophasic shock can be achieved with biphasic shocks of 130J (RR=0.99), 95%CI: 0.93-1.05) and 115J (RR=1.01, 95%CT: 0.95-1.08).  The 130J biphasic shock delivered on average 84.5J (95%CI: 82.8-86.2J) less energy than the 200J monophasic shock to achieve equivalent efficacy while the 115J biphasic shock delivered an average of 98.2J (95%CI: 97.1-99.4J) less energy.  Biphasic shocks result in less remarkable ST segment changes and faster return to sinus rhythm.

Conclusion: Biphasic waveforms defibrillate with equal efficacy at lower energies than standard 200J monophasic waveforms, and greater efficacy than monophasic shocks of the same energy.

[ Back to 48th ASM Abstract Index ]


Med-E-Serv