CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Welcome to the official website of the


CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand
CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo

contact
links
want to join?
register
search the CSANZ website
search the CSANZ website
     







search the CSANZ website













CSANZ Directory

CSANZ Member Directory

CSANZ Guidelines

Practice Guidelines

Training and Competence

Meetings

What's On and Where

ASM Abstracts Online

News and Views

Newsletter - On the Pulse

Newsletter - CNWG

In the News

Affiliate News
Career Opportunities

Affiliate Member Area

Affiliate Calendar

Affiliate Discussion

Scholarships/ Fellowships

Working Groups


ASM Abstracts

Relation of time to treatment on relative effects of primary coronary angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy

A Patel*, F Zijlstra, M Jones, C Grines, E Garcia, L Grinfeld, R Gibbons, E Ribeiro, F Ribichini, S Ellis, C Granger, F Akhras, WD Weaver, RJ Simes, for the PCAT Collaboration

NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney

We assessed the effect of thrombolytic therapy (TT) vs primary coronary angioplasty (PTCA) on 30-day mortality and reinfarction in 2635 patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), in an overview of individual patient data from 11 randomised trials. We examined whether the relative effectiveness of these strategies was associated with the time from the onset of symptoms to randomisation and with the time from randomisation to treatment. Overall, PTCA was associated with a lower risk of death at 30 days (odds ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.86, p=0.004) or death plus nonfatal MI (odds ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.67, p<0.0001), with a benefit observed to 6 months. For patients presenting later, with a longer time from symptom onset to randomisation, there was a higher risk of death at 30 days and a trend to an even greater relative reduction in mortality for PTCA compared with TT. In general, PTCA was started later than TT by 47 minutes (median time from randomisation 69 minutes vs 22 minutes). A randomised comparison of treatment within centres ranked by time to treatment showed a trend towards a smaller relative treatment effect of PTCA at 30 days in centres with a longer time difference between PTCA and TT. (P=0.06, see table).

Centres grouped by difference in time to Rx †

n

30-day death + MI (%)

Odds ratio (95% CI)

   

PTCA

TT

 

<35 minutes

 

4.7

15.8

0.26 (0.15 - 0.46)

35-55 minutes

1152

7.9

12.5

0.60 (0.41 - 0.89)

>55 minutes

 

8.3

12.1

0.66 (0.41 - 1.08)

† Difference in time from randomisation to initiation of treatment: PTCA vs TT

Conclusions:  There is clear evidence of benefit of PTCA over TT in the treatment of acute MI.  However, the longer time to initiate PTCA compared with TT may offset some of the advantage of PTCA and needs to be taken into account when the results of these randomised trials are applied to a broader community setting.              

[ Back to 48th ASM Abstract Index ]


Med-E-Serv