CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Welcome to the official website of the


CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand
CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo

contact
links
want to join?
register
search the CSANZ website
search the CSANZ website
     







search the CSANZ website













CSANZ Directory

CSANZ Member Directory

CSANZ Guidelines

Practice Guidelines

Training and Competence

Meetings

What's On and Where

ASM Abstracts Online

News and Views

Newsletter - On the Pulse

Newsletter - CNWG

In the News

Affiliate News
Career Opportunities

Affiliate Member Area

Affiliate Calendar

Affiliate Discussion

Scholarships/ Fellowships

Working Groups


ASM Abstracts

THE EFFECT OF INTRACORONARY GLIBENCLAMIDE ON CORONARY BLOOD FLOW AND CORONARY FLOW RESERVE IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE.

H.M.O Farouque, R.A.P Skyrme-Jones, M.J Zhang & I.T Meredith

Centre for Heart & Chest Research, Monash University, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne.

Glibenclamide (glib) is widely used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (DM). The insulin releasing effect of this agent is based on blockade of ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels in pancreatic beta cells. Recent evidence suggests KATP channels are also present on vascular smooth muscle cells and may contribute to blood flow regulation.   We therefore assessed the effect of acute KATP channel inhibition following the infusion of intracoronary (IC) glib in patients with known coronary artery disease.   Eight male patients (53±14 years, mean±SD), 5 of whom had DM who were scheduled for elective coronary angioplasty were recruited for this study. Resting coronary blood flow (CBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) were assessed in an angiographically smooth or mildly irregular non-angioplastied coronary artery using a 0.014" coronary Doppler flow wire.  IC glib was subselectively infused at 4mg/minute, 16mg/minute and 40mg/minute each for 5 minutes via a 2.8F infusion catheter. The doses were calculated to attain an estimated final IC concentration of 5ng/ml, 200ng/ml and 500ng/ml respectively. CBF was calculated from the product of basal average peak velocity (APV) determined from coronary Doppler flow velocimetry and coronary cross-sectional area obtained by quantitative coronary angiography. CFR was measured following IC boluses of 24mg of adenosine at the end of each glib infusion. Compared to vehicle infusion (0.9% saline), IC glib at the 3 doses assessed did not alter conduit vessel diameter (2.7±0.2 vs 2.6±0.2 vs 2.6±0.2 vs 2.5±0.2 mm), APV (21.8±2.2 vs  22.6±1.7 vs 23.9±2.5 vs 23.8±2.1 cm/sec), CBF (61.5±9.6 vs 62.5±9.5 vs 63.3±12.1 vs 59.8±9.5 mL/min)  or CVR (1.7±0.3 vs 1.7±0.3 vs 1.8±0.3 vs 1.9±0.3 mmHg·mL-1·min-1). CFR was similarly unchanged (2.7±0.3 vs 2.6±0.3 vs 2.4±0.2 vs 2.5±0.2). There were no effects on heart rate or blood pressure. Similarly glucose, insulin and C-peptide levels were also unchanged. In patients with coronary artery disease, IC glib (4mg/minute to 40ug/minute) has no demonstrable effect on CBF or CFR acutely.  This may be because redundant vasodilator mechanisms such as NO-mediated or prostacylin-mediated vasodilation may offset the effect of KATP channel inhibition.

[ Back to 48th ASM Abstract Index ]


Med-E-Serv