CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Welcome to the official website of the


CSANZ Logo
CSANZ Logo
Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand
CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo


CSANZ Logo

contact
links
want to join?
register
search the CSANZ website
search the CSANZ website
     







search the CSANZ website













CSANZ Directory

CSANZ Member Directory

CSANZ Guidelines

Practice Guidelines

Training and Competence

Meetings

What's On and Where

ASM Abstracts Online

News and Views

Newsletter - On the Pulse

Newsletter - CNWG

In the News

Affiliate News
Career Opportunities

Affiliate Member Area

Affiliate Calendar

Affiliate Discussion

Scholarships/ Fellowships

Working Groups


ASM Abstracts

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ELEVATED  TROPONIN I   IN   GENERAL HOSPITAL PATIENTS

AM Wilson*, A Boyle, A MacIsaac, R Whitbourn, VM Jelinek,  P Paull

Departments of Cardiology and Chemical Pathology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne

Introduction: An assay for cardiac Troponin I (Tr-I) has been shown to be valuable in assessing patients with acute chest pain. A normal serum Tr-I level has been associated with very low in-hospital and 30 day event rates in patients presenting to emergency departments with acute chest pain. The role of the assay  in a general hospital setting, particularly in patients without chest pain, has not been established.

Aim:To assess the clinical significance of elevated Troponin I levels in general hospital patients with and without chest pain.

Method:106 consecutive patients (62 male,44 female.Average age 68.2) with elevated Tr-I were reviewed for the presence and nature of chest pain, ECG abnormality (old and acute), elevations in Creatine Kinase(CK-MB),serum creatinine and age. In-hospital combined events (cardiac death, revascularisation and subsequent myocardial infarction),in-hospital angiography, 30 day combined events and 30 day angiography rates were reviewed. Admission for cardiac monitoring (either coronary care, telemetry or intensive care) was assessed.

Results: Of patients found to have an elevated Tr-I level ,only 55 of 106 (51.9%) had chest pain. Patients with chest pain had higher rates of in-hospital combined events (38.6%vs11.7% p 0.003), 30 day combined events (43.5%vs11.7% p<0.001) and angiography (56.1%vs 11.7% p<0.001). There was no significant difference in Tr-I level between patients with and without chest pain, (21.7 mcg/L +/-17.3 vs 22.7 mcg/L +/-18.5  p NS). In both groups of patients, the presence of acute ECG changes was correlated with events. Acute ECG changes were present in 81.8% of patients with chest pain who had events and 83.3% of patients without chest pain who had events. Overall, 69.6% of patients with chest pain had acute ECG changes vs 7.8% without chest pain, (p<0.001). A subgroup of 15 patients who had no clinical evidence of acute cardiac disease who were found to have elevated Tr-I levels had no events during follow-up.

Conclusion: Event rates in patients who have elevated Tr-I without chest pain are low and are associated with acute ECG abnormality. The principal role of this assay in general hospital practice appears to be in patients with acute chest pain without clear ECG evidence of acute ischaemia. The added clinical utility in other patient groups is unclear. There is need for extensive education for clinicians regarding patient selection and test interpretation. 

[ Back to 48th ASM Abstract Index ]


Med-E-Serv