Outcomes of Thrombus Aspiration During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Summary by Kevin Rajakariar 15 June 2022.

Authors: Kevin Rajakariar, Nick Andrianopoulos, Daniel Gayed, Danlu Liang, Brendan Backhouse, Andrew E Ajani, Stephen J Duffy, Angela Brennan, Louise Roberts, Christopher M Reid, Ernesto Oqueli, David Clark, Melanie Freeman

The use of thrombectomy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention has been a controversial topic, with large randomised controlled trials demonstrating conflicting results. While more recent randomised studies demonstrate no clear benefit in the use of routine thrombectomy during primary PCI, there are minimal real-world studies utilising thrombectomy in selected higher risk patients. These patients may have an increased thrombus burden, higher lesion complexity, no-reflow phenomenon, and evidence of cardiogenic shock. In addition, there have been significant concerns of the peri-procedural stroke risk associated with the use of thrombectomy, with further conflicting results between studies.

Our study analysed 6,270 consecutive patients between 2007 and 2018 undergoing primary PCI for STEMI, of which 26% underwent thrombectomy. While thrombus aspiration was most likely to be used in complex lesions with no coronary perfusion, there was no significant difference in post-procedural coronary flow, stroke, or mortality. Although there was a reduction in 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, this was not associated with a reduction in long-term mortality. However, thrombectomy was most likely to be used in sicker patients and it is unclear whether this subgroup of patients would have inferior outcomes if thrombectomy was not performed.

Available online now on the Internal Medicine Journal accepted articles page: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imj.15828

Cryoablation of Papillary Muscles at Surgery for Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias Due to Mitral Valve Prolapse

Surgical cryoablation should be considered in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) undergoing mitral valve surgery who have malignant ventricular arrhythmias or high ventricular ectopy load, as recommended in our article now published online in Heart, Lung and Circulation [1].

Mitral valve prolapse is a relatively common condition with a community incidence of about 2.4% [2]. While it generally has good prognosis, a small subset of patients suffer from malignant arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Out of 650 autopsies in young adults who died suddenly, 7% were due to MVP [3].

Ventricular ectopics are common in MVP. In a series of 595 consecutive patients, 43% had >5% and one third had moderate or severe nonsustained ventricular tachycardia [4]. These ectopics mainly arise from one or both papillary muscles and may act as triggers for malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is considered for malignant arrhythmia or in MVP patients in whom high ventricular ectopy load causes LV dysfunction. RF ablation of the papillary muscles has a modest success rate and high arrhythmia recurrence rate. Mitral valve surgery by itself does not prevent malignant ventricular arrhythmia.

In Heart, Lung and Circulation, we reported 3 cases of MVP and malignant ventricular arrhythmia who not only had mitral valve surgery but also underwent cryoablation of the papillary muscles at the time of surgery.

Two patients had moderate and one severe mitral regurgitation. All had received shocks from their implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and were not controlled with drug therapy. At surgery, encircling cryolesions were placed at the base of the papillary muscles which also targets distal arborisation of the Purkinje system. During a follow up of 3–11 years, all three patients have remained free of both malignant arrhythmia and ICD shocks. Cryoablation of papillary muscles had no detrimental effect on mitral valve function for any patient.

While we had not performed cardiac MRI in any of our patients, we would recommend it to assess areas of myocardial fibrosis which could be targeted by cryoablation. Further, wherever possible, we would now consider mitral valve repair rather than replacement.

References

  1. Vohra J, Morton JB, Morgan J, Tatoulis J. Cryoablation of papillary muscles at surgery for malignant ventricular arrhythmias due to mitral valve prolapse. Heart Lung Circ 2022. Link to online article: Cryoablation of Papillary Muscles at Surgery for Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias Due to Mitral Valve Prolapse – Heart, Lung and Circulation (heartlungcirc.org).
  2. Levine RA, Hagége AA, Judge DP, Padala M, Dal-Bianco JP, Aikawa E, et al.; Leducq Mitral Transatlantic Network. Mitral valve disease—morphology and mechanisms. Nat Rev Cardiol 2015;12:689–710.
  3. Basso C, Perazzolo Marra M, Rizzo S, De Lazaari M, Giorgi B, Cipriani A, et al. Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse and sudden cardiac death. Circulation 2015;132:556–66.
  4. Essayagh B, Sabbag A, Antoine C, Benfari G, Yang LT, Maalouf J et al. Presentation and outcome of arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:637-49.

By Jitendra Vohra, Joseph B Morton, John Morgan and James Tatoulis

ECG of the Month – June 2022

A 48 year-old male presents with 3 months of exertional dyspnoea.

He takes candesartan 8 mg daily and atenolol 50 mg daily for hypertension. ECG is shown above (Fig 1).

What is the most likely diagnosis?
Figure 1

This patient was originally diagnosed with sinus tachycardia at 100 bpm.

In fact this patient has a focal atrial tachycardia originating from the right upper pulmonary vein (ECG following ablation shown in Figure 3). Atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia with 2:1 conduction (the start of the ECG) are often misdiagnosed as sinus tachycardia. There are two important signs that should make one suspicious that this is not sinus rhythm. Firstly, the presence of a long apparent PR interval would be unusual for sinus tachycardia in a young patient whereby elevated sympathetic tone would ensure more slick conduction down the AV node. Secondly, ‘funny’ appearance of T-waves should make one suspicious that there are P waves buried within them. Looking at all leads, particularly V1 (Figure 2) and mapping them out is instructive.

Figure 2
Figure 3

ECG of the Month May 2022

Stem: A 29 year-old male presents with a 2 month history of frequent palpitations. His initial ECG is shown in Figure A. Bedside TTE shows mild-moderate global LV dysfunction. What are the differential diagnoses?

 

Figure A

 

Answer: This is a regular wide complex tachycardia with left bundle branch block morphology (QRS width ~ 125ms). Differential diagnoses for regular wide complex tachycardia (QRS > 120 ms) in general include VT, SVT with aberrancy (any regular SVT – inc. atrial tachycardia, AVNRT, AVRT, atrial flutter, sinus tachycardia), and pre-excited tachycardia. The typical LBBB morphology suggests that the ventricle is being activated from the region of the right bundle. Hence, specific diagnoses to consider given the morphology include SVT with LBBB aberrancy (or fixed LBBB), bundle branch reentrant VT, idiopathic moderator band VT and atriofascicular antidromic tachycardia.

 

 

Stem (continued): Adenosine was given with no effect suggesting this was less likely to be a re-entrant SVT involving the AV node (ie. AVNRT, AVRT). He was subsequently given metoprolol and amiodarone – ECGs post are shown (Figure B and C). Does this help with the diagnosis?

 

Figure B

 

 

Figure C

 

Answer: These ECGs rule in VT – there is clear cut AV dissociation (sinus p waves regularly marching through). In Figure C, there is some irregularity suggesting an automatic (rather than re-entrant) mechanism. VT continued despite cardioversion and amiodarone. Thus the patient has incessant VT causing a tachycardia mediated cardiomyopathy. Catheter ablation was performed with the focal VT successfully ablated at the moderator band (adjacent to the exit of the right bundle – hence the typical LBBB morphology). LV function returned to normal after 2 months.

Want to discuss these further – Ask a Question of A/Prof Alex Voskoboinik or upload your own Images for discussion.

Uploaded files:

  • Figure-A-May-2022.jpg
  • Figure-B-May-2022.jpg
  • Figure-C-May-2022.jpg

Diagnostic Performance of CT-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Australian Patients Referred for Invasive Coronary Angiography

The first use of non-invasive fractional flow reserve-derived from CT coronary angiography (FFRct) in Australian patients is reported in our article, now published in Heart, Lung and Circulation [1]. This technology is currently TGA-approved in Australia, although not approved for use under Medicare.

Advances in CT coronary angiography currently offer the ability to assess both the anatomical and physiological aspects of coronary disease within the one scan. Non-invasive fractional flow reserve derived from CT coronary angiography (FFRct) is a technology first described in 2011 [2], pioneered by HeartFlow in the USA. Large multicentre global validation studies have since established its diagnostic performance and prognostic implications to be comparable with invasive fractional flow reserve. Across the US, Europe and Japan, and following regulatory approval, FFRct has evolved to become part ofmainstream clinical practice; in US (American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology) and UK (The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE] guidelines, FFRct is currently recommended for use in patients with stable recent onset chest pain.

How does FFRct work? Using the images of a routinely acquired CT coronary angiogram, a model of the coronary luminal tree is derived. Physiological assumptions are made regarding the viscosity of blood, as well as inlet and outlet flow and pressure, based on their observed relationship in accordance with vessel size and myocardial mass. These assumptions are then applied to the luminal model. Flow and pressure are derived using computational fluid dynamics across the entire coronary tree [3]. When compared with invasive fractional flow reserve, FFRct has high diagnostic performance. Importantly, it provides improved specificity for detection of vessel specific ischaemia compared with anatomical stenosis assessment using CT coronary angiography alone.

Our study included 109 patients who had undergone CT coronary angiography and invasive fractional flow reserve; the technology of FFRct was retrospectively applied. In this cohort of Australian patients, the diagnostic performance of FFRct was found to be comparable with the existing international literature, with demonstrated improvement in performance compared with CT coronary angiography alone for detection of vessel specific ischaemia.

[1]​Chua A, Ihdayhid AR, Linde J, Sorgaard M, Cameron JD, Seneviratne S, Ko BS. Diagnostic Performance of CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Australian Patients Referred for Invasive Coronary Angiography. Heart Lung Circ 2022; Article in press https://www.heartlungcirc.org/article/S1443-9506(22)00115-9/fulltext

[2]​Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, Daniels DV, Jegere S, Kim HS, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1989-97.

[3]​Khav N, Ihdayhid AR, Ko B. CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve (CT-FFR) in the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease. Heart Lung Circ 2020; 29: 1621-32.

Summary by co-author Brian Ko

Specialists keen for further cardio-oncology services and education

Prof Kazuaki Negishi, 24 May 2022

Cardio-oncology is a rapidly emerging speciality globally. Cardio-oncology is dedicated to the prevention, identification, and treatment of cardiovascular complications in cancer patients as well as in long-term survivors. This is pertinent as cancer treatments are more complex than ever and cancer survivorship is rapidly increasing. Notably, Australia has one of the best cancer survivor rates globally.

An article published in the Internal Medicine Journal, led by Professor Kazuaki Negishi, senior author and of University of Sydney and Nepean Hospital assessed the status of cardio-oncology services in Australia through an online multi-disciplinary survey. There were 118 responses analysed with 70% reporting no dedicated cardio-oncology services existed at their institution, with insufficient funding being the main reason. Most respondents were oncologists (35%), followed by cardiologist (31%), haematologist (18%) and radiation oncologists (14%). The vast majority of respondents agreed or strongly agreed (86%) cardio-oncology is an important sub-speciality. Cancer specialists estimated 15% of their patients did not receive optimal cancer care due to cardiotoxicity or a history of cardiovascular disease. Additionally, 50% of cancer specialists were neutral to very unconfident in identifying cardiotoxicity. In regard to cardio-oncology education, nearly all respondent supported increased cardio-oncology session at national society meetings (88%) and the creation of national cardio-oncology guidelines (97%).

The results of this Australian first survey demonstrate “the overwhelming support for Australian cardio-oncology guidelines and an increased presence at national society meetings suggest there is a sizable appetite for the growth of cardio-oncology services in Australia.” Hopefully, these findings can be used for an evidence base for further funding of cardio-oncology services in Australia.

In conclusion, the authors suggest “a multi-disciplinary team funding model following existing templates in oncology may be a pathway forward. Our findings indicate that there is a strong support for further cardio-oncology education, guidelines and services nationally.”

 

You can find the full article here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imj.15682

 

Prediction of Pacemaker Requirements in Patients with Unexplained Syncope: the DROP Score

Prediction of Pacemaker Requirements in Patients with Unexplained Syncope: the DROP Score

Summary by Alex Voskoboinik

Syncope is a common presentation encountered by physicians in both the acute and ambulatory setting, and is a frequent presentation in the elderly population. While syncope is frequently encountered by cardiologists, the diagnostic approach to identify cardiogenic syncope can be varied, challenging and resource intensive, and may involve a multitude of investigations including tilt table testing and use of implantable loop recorder. While clinical and electrophysiologic features suggestive of cardiogenic syncope have been well-demonstrated in contemporary literature, there is an absence of a simple syncope risk score readily accessible to clinicians to assist in identifying cardiogenic syncope and subsequent requirement for permanent pacing. Current syncope risk scores, such as the San Francisco Syncope Rule and EGSYS score have not been validated for use outside the Emergency Department.

In this study of 100 consecutive patients receiving implantable loop recorder, 50 of whom underwent pacemaker insertion due to bradyarrhythmias detected on implantable loop recorder and 50 of whom did not have any arrhythmias detected for >3 years, four significant predictors of bradycardic syncope were identified. These were incorporated into the DROP score: Distal conduction disease, Related historical predisposing or precipitating factors absent, Older age >65 years and PR interval prolongation >200ms. Of significance, higher DROP scores strongly predicted requirement of permanent pacing in time-to-event analysis. The DROP score may be of benefit in identifying patients that are likely to benefit from upfront pacemaker insertion following unexplained syncope.

You can find the full article online in the HLC here https://www.heartlungcirc.org/article/S1443-9506(22)00104-4/fulltext

Xiaoman Xiao, MBBS; Jeremy William, MBBS; Peter M. Kistler, MBBS, PhD; Stephen Joseph, MBBS, PhD; Hitesh C. Patel, MBBS, PhD; Gautam Vaddadi, MBBS, PhD; Jonathan M. Kalman, MBBS, PhD; Justin A. Mariani, MBBS, PhD; Aleksandr Voskoboinik, MBBS, PhD.

Published: March 31, 2022  DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2022.03.002

ECG of the Month April 2022

A 25 year-old male with no past history presents with palpitations.

What is the most likely diagnosis?    Why are there two QRS morphologies?

 

 

The Answer:

This is a ‘regularly irregular’ narrow complex tachycardia (hence not AF). There are clear p-waves marching through (with more A’s than V’s) with an isoelectric interval between them suggestive of a focal atrial tachycardia (blue arrow), particularly in the absence of structural heart disease. The p waves are inferiorly directed, suggesting they are coming from the top of the atria. In this case, there is Wenckebach conduction down the AV node (3:2 ratio) with progressive PR prolongation before a dropped beat. The change in QRS morphology is due to Ashman phenomenon – this is aberrant ventricular conduction affecting the distal conduction system due to a change in QRS cycle length, and it can be seen in any supraventricular arrhythmia. It is usually described as a wide QRS complex that follows a short R-R interval preceded by a long R-R interval (L – long, S – short in Figure).  I occurs because the action potential duration (and hence refractory period) changes with the preceding R–R interval. A longer cycle lengthens the ensuing refractory period, and if a shorter cycle follows, the beat terminating the cycle tends to be conducted with aberrancy. The patient underwent catheter ablation of a focal tachycardia arising near the crista terminalis / SVC region.

 

IMPACT for Suspected ACS in ED: An Appropriate Pathway for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients too

Summary by Paul Bridgman

Louise Cullen et al; Heart, Lung and Circulation  

Cullen and colleagues have previously reported that the IMPACT (The Improved Assessment of Chest Pain Trial) protocol can safely and efficiently allow a large proportion of general patients presenting to EDs with chest pain to undergo accelerated assessment for low, intermediate or high risk of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).1 After risk assessment, and 2-hour serial troponin results, those deemed at low-risk could be safely discharged without further objective assessment.
Now, working with support from local Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Community-Controlled Health Organisations (ATSICCHOs), Cullen and colleagues have confirmed that the IMPACT pathway can also be safely implemented for patients of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin.2
In this trial, high and intermediate risk was managed according to the IMPACT pathway, but low-risk patients had additional cardiac testing in line with the National Heart Foundation/Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand 2016 guidelines for the management of ACS.3
Conducted in the Emergency Department of Cairns Hospital, Queensland between November 2017 and December 2019, the trial recruited 155 patients, classified as 11.6% low-risk, 56.1% intermediate-risk and 32.3% high risk for ACS. All patients with ACS were identified on their index admission. None of the patients assessed as low risk of ACS had any evidence of coronary artery disease from objective testing, and none had adverse cardiac events within 30 days of presentation. However, a high burden of cardiovascular risk factors was noted in this cohort.

The research found higher rates of ACS and at a younger age compared with the first IMPACT trial. It also found a high proportion of females with ACS (male, 38.1%). The authors state these findings should not only inform clinicians but also direct public health campaigns to better target those at risk.

You can find the full article here: https://www.heartlungcirc.org/article/S1443-9506(22)00078-6/fulltext  

1. Med J Aust 2017; 207 (5): 195-200.
2. Heart Lung Circ 2022; DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2022.02.010
3. Heart Lung Circ 2016; 25:895-951.

A randomised controlled trial of stress in stress cardiomyopathy patients

A randomised controlled trial of stress in stress cardiomyopathy patients

By Paul Bridgman 23 March 2022

It has been long debated whether the cause for stress cardiomyopathy is in the brain, the heart, or even perhaps in the connection between the two. A cardinal feature of the cardiomyopathy is QT prolongation, onset shortly after the precipitating event and then worsening over an average of three days before resolving.  Published this week in PLOS One, a randomised control trial seeks to establish whether women who have recovered from stress cardiomyopathy show any increased susceptibility to QT prolongation with repeated exposure to emotional stress.

The trial included 12 women with a history of the condition and 12 controls without major cardiovascular disease. On two separate occasions, these women had 24-hour ECGs recorded with a holter monitor and were either subjected to a stress-inducing hyperventilation exercise or a calming diaphragmatic breathing exercise.

The trial showed that heart rate increases, and that QTc prolongs in response to the stress. The QT prolongation persisted for 20 minutes. As a secondary purely emotional stressor unheralded phone calls were made to the participants during the trial with similar results, there was no difference in response between cases and controls. While the trial showed that the QT interval is labile and strongly affected by emotion, there is nothing intrinsically different in response between the patients and the controls. Reassuringly, there was no evidence that the cases carried a background alteration in QT sensitivity.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0265607

Authors: Watson GM, Sutherland J, Lacey C, Bridgman PG (2022)

Posts navigation